Natasha Poly Vs. Lara Stone

Dear Sirs and Madams, go to The Imagist and read Who’s On First 2009. Pitting Natasha Poly against Lara Stone seems hardly fair (there is a clear winner). So in the mean time, see what I think…

Although to argue this is futile because it is based solely on the opinions of deranged fashion fans, I would like to point out some things that many may not think about. Lara Stone has many clear advantages over Natasha Poly.
A. The Name — Lara Stone. Short. Memorable. Like a ROCK. This gives her the persona of a warrior. Natasha Poly. Poly could mean something to do with her stick figure. But to me it sounds like the other 100 million russian model names. Her real name is Natalia Polevshchikova. Bland. Boring. Not worth mention.

B. The Body — Although Natasha has flashed a nip or two in her day. The “breast-out” award certainly goes to Lara. I have seen Lara’s breasts more times than I can count fingers and toes. This = memorable. Love it or hate it, we all talk about Lara’s breasts, whether it’s a “Here we go again”, or “They are so perky”.
C. Memorability — Natasha Poly has blond hair and brown eyes. Lara Stone has blond hair and brown eyes. Coincidence? Lara has the bone structure of an early homo sapien. Natasha Poly has pretty big cheekbones as well. Lara Stone has “THE GAP”. That famous teeth gap that is unforgettable. It’s the quirky looks that win out the top spot. Kate Moss has the widest face I’ve ever seen. I just gotta say it, I could pick Lara out of a stadium. Natasha…. not so sure.

D. Look into her eyes and tell me Lara isn’t the better candidate for stealing our hearts, wowing our minds, and pushing the boundaries of fashion models.

So I think we have ourselves a winner. The Top Spot should, and I repeat, should, because these things aren’t set in Stone (okay, they deff are). But Lara Stone is the she-th for me-ith. That’s it. That’s all.